terça-feira, 4 de outubro de 2016

Netflix Investors Apparently Excited Over Disney Acquisition Rumor

Image result for variety logo

Netflix stock climbed above $100 per share on Monday, to its highest levels since May — fueled by a rumor circulating on Wall Street that Disney might possibly be interested in acquiring the video-streaming leader.
Netflix stock closed up 4.1% Monday, to $102.63 per share, on higher-than-usual volume. On Tuesday, Netflix shares climbed as high as $104.44 in early trading, before settling down to below the opening price of $103.50.
Rumors that the Mouse House or possibly Apple might be interested in snapping up Netflix — which currently has a market cap exceeding $44 billion — were alluded to in a research note by Robert W. Baird & Co. analyst Will Power. Regarding “recent M&A rumors,” Power wrote, “whether Disney, Apple or someone else, Netflix could become a target.”
Netflix investors have been concerned about the company’s slowing growth in the U.S., as it undertakes a shift to move all subscribers to the $9.99-per-month standard tier. The stock, which has a notoriously volatile history, is trading well off its $133.27 per share 52-week high.
Speculation that Disney might be looking to make a major deal for Netflix comes after the media conglomerate was said to be looking at buying Twitter, according to a Bloomberg report. Disney also has demonstrated a keen interest in the streaming-video market: In August, it announced the purchase of a 33% stake in Major League Baseball’s BAM Tech unit for $1 billion.
The first issue for Disney would be trying to justify the massive purchase price: Netflix trades at a whopping price-earnings ratio of around 320, and any deal would have a negative impact on Disney’s balance sheet and earnings. Disney also would face other potential hurdles if it actually moved to buy Netflix, including regulatory scrutiny and the fact that rival studios would be even more reluctant to play ball with a Disney-owned Netflix.

domingo, 28 de agosto de 2016

O conteúdo importa

Resultado de imagem para logo folha de sao paulo










SÃO PAULO ­ Para o PT e parte da esquerda, a mídia é um dos responsáveis pela queda de Dilma Rousseff. No discurso petista, os principais meios de comunicação se uniram às elites conservadoras para derrubar um governo que vinha fazendo reformas de caráter popular.

Tais proposições me parecem frágeis, mas o que pretendo hoje é discutir outra coisa: o poder da imprensa de modificar a realidade. O que subjaz à narrativa petista, afinal, é a ideia de que o governo ia razoavelmente bem, mas que essa percepção foi bloqueada por vontade da mídia.

Não há dúvida de que os meios de comunicação exercem algum tipo de influência. Caso contrário, não valeriam de nada, não seriam procurados por quem tem algo a dizer nem por anunciantes. A questão relevante aqui é se conseguem ir além de refletir o mundo real, moldando até certo ponto as percepções do público, e se tornam capazes de criar realidades ao bel­prazer de seus controladores. 

Um autor caro à esquerda, Karl Marx, pensava que não. Num texto de 1842 para o "Rheinische Zeitung", afirmou que a imprensa livre é tão responsável por alterar as condições do mundo "quanto o telescópio do astrônomo é responsável pela incessante moção do Universo". 

Para sustentar o contrário é preciso supor que as pessoas não passam de fantoches que fazem tudo o que a mídia lhe ordena. Ora, o que os estudos mais modernos sugerem é que somos seres bastante influenciáveis, por fatores às vezes tão improváveis quanto a música que toca ao fundo. O poder dessas interferências, porém, está longe de absoluto. Elas alteram a proporção de pessoas que responde de um jeito ou de outro aos exercícios propostos pelos pesquisadores, mas só raramente levam alguém a fazer aquilo que não quer. 

Um bom marqueteiro até pode convencer alguns incautos de que titica de cachorro é uma iguaria culinária. Mas dificilmente vai ficar rico vendendo isso. O conteúdo importa.


http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/helioschwartsman/2016/08/1807584-o-conteudo-importa.shtml

terça-feira, 9 de agosto de 2016

Chinese tech firms forced to choose market: home or everywhere else




HONG KONG — For teenagers who like to sing along with Ariana Grande and Flo Rida, Musical.ly is a must-have. The app that lets users lip-sync and dance in their own music videos boasts 100 million users and partners with pop stars like Ms. Grande and Meghan Trainor.
It’s not easy to tell Musical.ly is Chinese — and that’s deliberate. To find success in America, its parent company has ignored China, its home market and a country with 700 million internet users.
The reason is simple, says Alex Zhu, co-founder of Shanghai-based Musical.ly: China’s internet is fundamentally different from the one used in much of the rest of the world.
“It’s still very difficult to get into China,” said Mr. Zhu, who studied civil engineering at Zhejiang University in the eastern city of Hangzhou. “It’s a closed environment, and you have to be quite different to compete in that market.”
Two decades after Beijing began walling off its homegrown internet from the rest of the planet, the digital world has split between China and everybody else. That has prevented American technology companies like Facebook and Uber, which recently agreed to sell its China operations, from independently being able to tap the Chinese market.
For China’s web companies, the divide may have even more significant implications.

It has penned in the country’s biggest and most innovative internet companies. Alibaba, Baidu and Tencent have grown to be some of the world’s largest internet companies, but they rely almost entirely on domestic businesses. Their ventures abroad have been mostly desultory, and prognostications that they will challenge American giants internationally have not materialized.
Alex Zhu, co-founder of Musical.ly, in a meeting with staff members at the company’s offices in Shanghai.CreditGilles Sabrie for The New York Times

For Chinese web start-ups like Musical.ly, the internet split has also forced them to choose — either create something that caters to China’s digital population or focus on the rest of the globe.
Continue reading the main story
In many ways, the split is like 19th century railroads in the United States, when rails of different sizes hindered a train’s ability to go from one place to another.
“The barrier to entering the U.S. or China market is becoming higher and higher,” said Kai-fu Lee, a venture investor from Taiwan and former head of Google China.
The difficulties that China’s internet companies face in expanding their success abroad are epitomized by WeChat, the messaging app owned by Tencent. In China, WeChat combines e-commerce and real-world services in ways that have Western companies playing catch-up. It has about 700 million users, most of whom are Chinese or use it to connect with people in China.
In 2012, armed with a cash stockpile of several hundred million dollars, the world soccer star Lionel Messi as a spokesman and local ads like Bollywood-inspired commercials in India, Tencent began a push that executives said would be its best chance of breaking out of China. The effort flopped.
Critics pointed to Tencent’s lack of distinctive marketing, a record of censorship and surveillance in China and its late arrival to foreign markets. Yet the biggest problem was that outside of China, WeChat was just not the same. Within China, WeChat can be used to do almost everything, like pay bills, hail a taxi, book a doctor’s appointment, share photos and chat. Yet its ability to do that is dependent on other Chinese internet services that are limited outside the country.
That leaves WeChat outside China as an app that people mostly use to chat and share photos — not that different from WhatsApp and Messenger, which are both owned by Facebook. Baidu and Alibaba have apps that similarly offer a range of capabilities, yet are less useful outside China.
The same problem hurts start-ups in China. Those companies start out accustomed to using Chinese internet sites and apps to market and enhance their business. But going abroad means a different world of services to master, such as a solid understanding of Facebook and Google’s platforms and ads, not Baidu’s and Tencent’s.
By contrast, Musical.ly chose the opposite approach and linked itself to the most popular social networks in the United States. If someone records an impressively coordinated dance or flawlessly lip-synced song, the person can put it up not just on the app, but also add it to Instagram, send it on WhatsApp or post it to Facebook. That has helped Musical.ly grow naturally to Europe, South America and Southeast Asia, Mr. Zhu said.
“The thing about this young generation in the U.S. is, they’re creative,” said Mr. Zhu. “They’ll say, ‘Please follow me on Instagram or Snapchat.’ If your app can attract some people in an age group and make them super excited to share, you will probably grow.”
For Cheetah Mobile, a maker of smartphone utility apps based in Beijing whose users are mostly outside China, the solution was finding a steppingstone to the rest of the world. In early 2014, it opened an office in Taiwan, where use of Google and Facebook dominates. That helped it gain employees who intimately understood Facebook, YouTube and other major Western platforms that could be used for advertising.
“Taiwan served as a bridge for us across the Pacific to the United States,” said Charles Fan, Cheetah’s chief technology officer.
Tencent, Alibaba and Baidu have all opened American offices, but they have mostly turned to investments and acquisitions to gain footholds overseas. Over the last two years, Alibaba has invested in emerging markets, including two online commerce companies, Paytm and Snapdeal, in India. It also spent $1 billion to acquire Lazada, an e-commerce site popular in Southeast Asia.
Tencent has been more aggressive in Western markets. In June, it made itslargest overseas deal, paying $8.6 billion for Supercell, the Finnish company that created the popular mobile game Clash of Clans. Tencent also has a stake in the games company Activision Blizzard and bought one of the most played games in the world, League of Legends.
The Shanghai offices of Musical.ly, a Chinese start-up that chose to build its business abroad.CreditGilles Sabrie for The New York Times
Perhaps the greatest indication of Tencent’s overseas ambitions was a deal that never happened. In 2014, with its global WeChat campaign faltering, it was preparing to start negotiations to bid for WhatsApp when Facebook swooped in, according to a senior Tencent executive who asked for anonymity in discussing corporate strategy.
Tencent and Baidu declined to comment. An Alibaba spokeswoman referred to recent remarks by Alibaba’s president, J. Michael Evans, in which he pointed to acquisitions as a way the company was attracting new consumers in developing markets. He also said Alibaba was focused on attracting more foreign businesses to sell on its markets in China.
Mr. Lee said it might take a new technological jump for Chinese companies to get a chance at building a platform inside China and internationally. He said Chinese companies could prove competitive in emerging sectors like virtual reality, artificial intelligence and robotics.
“I think what might be surprising is, China will catch up rapidly,” he said. “Partly because of Chinese universities, partly because of returnees to China who form a portion of the top engineers in the world.”
Musical.ly is in many ways a product of the cultural exchange between the United States and China that Mr. Lee described. Mr. Zhu, 37, graduated from a Chinese university, but moved to the United States with the German software company SAP in 2010. He had the idea for the music app while riding the train from San Francisco to Mountain View, Calif., in a car full of high school students.
“Half were listening to music and the other half were using their phone to take photos and add emojis, and they were passing them around,” Mr. Zhu said. Then it hit him: combine the selfie and social media part with the music part and turn it into one product. In 2015, Mr. Zhu moved to Shanghai, where his co-founder has been based since Musical.ly’s 2013 inception.
Yet Musical.ly is unlikely to be the social network to link both sides of the Pacific. For the demographic the app is focusing on, it’s far better to be outside its home market, Mr. Zhu said.
“Teenagers in the U.S. are a golden audience,” he said. “If you look at China, the teenage culture doesn’t exist — the teens are super busy in school studying for tests, so they don’t have the time and luxury to play social media apps.”








segunda-feira, 25 de julho de 2016

Verizon is buying Yahoo for $4.8 billion by Cristina Alesci, Seth Fiegerman and Charles Riley

Verizon to buy Yahoo for $4.8 billion
Verizon to buy Yahoo for $4.8 billion

Resultado de imagem para logo cnn money

It's official: Yahoo's days as an independent company are over.

Verizon has agreed to pay $4.83 billion for Yahoo (YHOO, Tech30), the companies said before markets opened Monday.
The sale completes Yahoo's evolution from influential search pioneer and web portal juggernaut to, in the end, a once-dominant brand that lost its way.
Parties as diverse as Warren Buffett and The Daily Mail were interested in buying Yahoo. But after a sale process that dragged on for months, Verizon (VZ, Tech30), long viewed as the frontrunner, is walking away with Yahoo's more than one billion monthly active users.
Current Yahoo shareholders will keep the company's lucrative investments in Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba and Yahoo Japan. They will be spun into a separate, yet-to-be-named, publicly traded company. The deal also excludes some patents and Yahoo's cash.
The Verizon deal must be approved by regulators and is expected to be finalized in the first quarter of 2017.
yahoo stock
The sale puts an end to Yahoo's 21-year history as an independent company. Yahoo will now be integrated with Verizon-owned AOL under Marni Walden, an executive vice president at the telecom company.
It also ends a turnaround effort by Marissa Mayer, who joined Yahoo four years ago and promised to revitalize the company. Verizon and Yahoo have not commented on who will lead Yahoo once the deal is complete.
It's unclear what Mayer will do after the deal closes. A spokesman for Yahoo said it's "too early to say" whether she will stay on as CEO, accept a new role at Verizon, or step aside. Meanwhile, Mayer says she will stay on to see Yahoo through its transition.
"For me personally, I'm planning to stay," Mayer wrote Monday in a memo to employees posted on Tumblr. "I love Yahoo, and I believe in all of you. It's important to me to see Yahoo into its next chapter."
AOL CEO Tim Armstrong told CNN's Poppy Harlow that he and Mayer are focusing first on getting "the strategy right, and then the structure and the roles right."
"I've known Marissa for almost 20 years," Armstrong said. "The press has tried to make it a little more of drama camp, but we come from similar backgrounds."
On a conference call with analysts after the announcement, Mayer repeated that line before adding, "A lot of the integration discussions are still ahead of us."
Mayer also tried to frame the deal in a positive light on the call. She touted Verizon's potential to "accelerate our revenue stream in digital advertising" and repeatedly said she was "excited" for the future.
"The single biggest thing this whole deal is about is scale," Armstrong told Harlow. "We will essentially end up being one of the largest portfolios of consumer brands in the world for digital."
Mayer, like Armstrong, previously worked at Google (GOOG) before taking over the top spot at Yahoo in 2012. She invested heavily in improving Yahoo's mobile products, expanding its audience through the acquisition of Tumblr and doubling down on premium media content. She brought in TV journalist Katie Couric as Yahoo's "global anchor."
But Mayer struggled to slow Yahoo's overall ad sales decline.
After reporting earnings last week, Mayer made what may have been her final case to investors and the public that she worked to "create a better Yahoo."
But the sale price suggests that Yahoo's glory days ended long ago. In 2008, for example, Microsoft (MSFT, Tech30) was willing to pay more than $45 billion for Yahoo, an offer that was rebuffed by cofounder Jerry Yang.
Yahoo was synonymous with the Internet itself in the late '90s. But for Verizon, the deal is about more than just nostalgia. The telecom company has invested in digital content and advertising in recent years, buying AOL and the Huffington Post.
Investors were less than thrilled. Shares of Yahoo were down nearly 4% Monday afternoon.
--CNN's Poppy Harlow contributed to this report.

sexta-feira, 15 de julho de 2016

A Comunicação Social morreu. Viva o novo profissional de Comunicação!

A Comunicação Social morreu. Viva o novo profissional de Comunicação!






Gilberto Scofield Jr.

Diretor na Máquina Cohn & Wolfe

Ainda no ano 2000, enquanto o mundo respirava aliviado porque o Apocalipse previsto com o Bug do Milênio não tinha acontecido, recebi um convite do querido jornalista Helio Muniz para um mergulho na febre das empresas pontocom. Nossa missão era colocar de pé a parte de conteúdo e bolar a interface do iG Finance, braço do portal iG voltado para notícias econômicas e um dos primeiros portais a tentar vender produtos financeiros na rede. A ideia era ótima, mas esbarrou numa série de incompreensões e desentendimentos típicos daquela fase eufórica de experimentalismo digital sem a devida compreensão de como a coisa deveria funcionar na prática.
Havia estranhamentos internos: o banco Opportunity, que era o financiador do projeto, queria que os jornalistas que trabalhavam no portal fazendo conteúdo seguissem o mesmo horário dos profissionais do banco que tratavam de vender os serviços financeiros, ou seja, entrar às 8h e sair às 17h. Mas para jornalistas de finanças, o chamado after-market, aquele período imediatamente após o fechamento dos mercados (bolsas, câmbio, papéis do Tesouro, etc.),  é fundamental para se fazer um balanço sólido do que aconteceu no dia. Ou seja, como os investidores interagiram de fato ao que aconteceu naquele dia na economia do país e do mundo. Era preciso chegar mais tarde e sair mais tarde.  
Havia incompreensões externas: pouca gente sabia, naquela época, os hábitos dos brasileiros em termos de consumo de produtos financeiros na internet. Havia muitas dúvidas sobre a segurança do sistema. Sem um robusto projeto de comunicação e marketing do portal e esbarrando nestes vários desentendimentos, acabei voltando para o Globo, onde eu era editor adjunto de Economia, para ajudar nas mudanças no site do jornal.
Isso foi lá atrás. Há 16 anos. Hoje, com o surgimento das mídias sociais e a evolução da inteligência digital, não faz mais sentido se pensar em Comunicação Social como a gente fazia há 10 anos (nem precisa ir muito longe). As mudanças continuam, a revolução digital segue em frente e é preciso refazer tudo: das rotinas corporativas às rotinas pessoais, da maneira como enxergamos leitores e consumidores à maneira como nos comunicamos com eles. O tempo e as distâncias se encurtaram. Definitivamente, a época de se fazer jornalismo olhando somente para anunciante e acionistas não existe mais. A maneira de se fazer publicidade e marketing de olho somente no produto ou nas vendas não tem mais espaço num mundo onde o consumidor final se empoderou tanto. Por fim, as antigas táticas de Relações Públicas e comunicação corporativa que se limitavam ao envio de releases ou de jabás para jornalistas enfrentam uma realidade onde uma empresa que queira falar com seu público pode nem chegar perto de um jornal como conhecemos. Basta uma ação no Instagram.
A indústria da Comunicação Social, que antes dividia-se claramente no tripé jornalismo (conteúdos de narrativa), publicidade/marketing/branding e Relações Públicas (comunicação corporativa) virou um bicho único, totalmente horizontalizado com a popularização da internet, redes sociais e novas plataformas digitais.  Não é possível, hoje, trabalhar em comunicação fazendo apenas uma dessas três pernas. Qualquer agência de RP ou de publicidade ou assessoria de imprensa ou mesmo os produtores de conteúdo tradicionais, como a velha mídia, foram varridos pela digitalização dos meios. O consumidor se empoderou com a internet e as redes sociais e virou o jogo. Não é à toa que a maioria das produtoras de cinema virou produtora de conteúdo de imagem para qualquer um que pague, de corporações a canais de streaming, tipo Netflix ou YouTube.
Então a percepção que se tem no mundo da Comunicação Social, hoje, é que as agências de publicidade, de RP, assessorias de imprensa e até mesmo a imprensa vão virar empresas de comunicação multiplataforma. Ponto. A remuneração será feita mais pela estratégia intelectual - e isso inclui produtos que tenham dentro uma estratégia intelectual de comunicação e serviço, como, digamos, o aplicativo Waze - versus horas dedicadas do que por qualquer bônus de volume ou veiculação. Desde o valerioduto do mensalão, este velho modelo ruiu. Agora, diante na nova realidade digital, até mesmo a eficácia dos tradicionais anúncios na mídia como forma de comunicação vem sendo questionada.
Vencerá quem vender melhor a estratégia intelectual como um todo e em todos os formatos. A tradicional Comunicação Social morreu. Viva o novo profissional de comunicação!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/comunica%C3%A7%C3%A3o-social-morreu-viva-o-novo-profissional-de-scofield-jr-