segunda-feira, 10 de agosto de 2015

Google becomes part of a new company, Alphabet

 
Google, one of the best-known brands on the planet, on Monday radically restructured itself under the corporate name Alphabet, an almost unprecedented shift that reflects the company’s far-reaching ambitions and the vast Web it helped evolve.
The move represents Google’s biggest push yet to transcend its roots in the simple but highly profitable business of Web search and turn the company into a multifaceted General Electric for the digital age.
In the new organization, Google’s core business, which handles two out of every three Web searches worldwide, will be a single division that will also include video giant YouTube, smartphone system Android, as well as maps, ads and apps.
Other businesses in the $444 billion empire will be separate divisions under the everything-company Alphabet, investing in anti-aging research (Calico), the Internet of Things (Nest’s “smart” home thermostats), delivery drones (Project Wing), ultrafast Internet (Fiber), futuristic headsets (Glass) anddriverless cars.
The unexpected change marks a speedy and potentially risky shift for the Web colossus whose name years ago became a verb, upending a corporate-America playbook that has preached reshufflings should be done dodderingly, if at all.
But Google executives said the “birth of Alphabet” meant far more than corporate wordplay and would instead mark both the start of “a very exciting new chapter in the life of Google” and the dawn of a strengthening push for the future Web.
“This new structure will allow us to keep tremendous focus on the extraordinary opportunities we have inside of Google,” Larry Page, Google co-founder and Alphabet chief executive, wrote Monday in a post revealing the change.
“We’ve long believed that over time companies tend to get comfortable doing the same thing, just making incremental changes,” Page wrote. “But in the technology industry, where revolutionary ideas drive the next big growth areas, you need to be a bit uncomfortable to stay relevant.”
The tech giant, one of the world’s most valuable companies, has invested heavily in the software, systems and infrastructure needed to keep its constellation of profitable breakthroughs connected.
But it has also helped finance innovations outside the walls of its Mountain View headquarters — the Googleplex — by financing startups and swelling corporations though its investment arms, Google Ventures and Google Capital.
Many of Google’s boldest innovations have arisen from its enigmatic research lab, Google X, including Contact Lens, a pair of glucose-measuring lenses for people with diabetes, and Project Loon, a swarm of high-flying balloons that could deliver Internet to the world’s most remote locales.
But it has struggled to escape the orbital pull of the Google brand, which first whispered onto an infant Internet in 1998, the brainchild of two Stanford University students with the mission to catalog the world’s information.
Google’s sweeping expansion has not undermined its prime moneymaker, search, which has helped the company blast toward $60 billion in yearly revenue.
But the unpredictable focus has led some investors and analysts to call for a narrower streamlining of its side projects, particularly when compared to titans like Apple and Facebook, whose innovation has often served primarily to funnel users to its core enterprise.
Some analysts who raised concerns about Google’s growth also wondered how well the differing businesses would get along. Brian Wieser, a senior analyst with Pivotal Research Group, questioned how Alphabet’s collection of disparate businesses would compete for capital, particularly when comparing ventures with vastly different markets and odds of success.
“Google is trying to provide incremental transparency in their business profiles,” he said, “but whether that is sufficient to make a difference remains to be seen.”
Google co-founder, Sergey Brin, will become Alphabet’s president and former Google chief executive, Eric Schmidt, will be its executive chairman. Sundar Pichai, Page’s soft-spoken deputy and Google’s senior vice president, will become the search subsidiary’s chief executive.
Alphabet will remain a public company, replacing the Google name in trading and in shareholders’ portfolios (but not its symbol on Nasdaq, which will stay as GOOG and GOOGL). Shares in the company surged nearly 6 percent in after-hours trading.
But there are risks involved with such a sweeping make-over, including in the details. Page said executives chose the name Alphabet because it “represents language, one of humanity’s most important innovations.”
Yet the company could not secure Alphabet.com, which is a domain name owned by the carmaker BMW. The main site for the new company, instead, is abc.xyz.
The Alphabet mega-umbrella also was seemingly unable to secure the Twitter handle @alphabet, which has instead been run since 2007 by a Cleveland “dad, husband and self-proclaimed geek.”
His tweet after the news broke: “Well, that was an interesting way to end a Monday...”
Drew Harwell is a national business reporter at The Washington Post.
Hayley Tsukayama covers consumer technology for The Washington Post

Google agora pertence à Alphabet, holding criada pelos seus fundadores

EM GOOGLE
 
Por meio de uma publicação em seu blog oficial, a Google anunciou que agora faz parte de uma empresa chamada “Alphabet”. É isso mesmo! Na verdade, a Gigante das Buscas não foi comprada (e quem conseguiria?), mas sim transformada em uma holding, a tal Alphabet. Com isso, essa nova empresa compreenderá a Google, a Nest, a Calico, a Fiber e vários outros negócios que a empresa criou e comprou nos últimos anos.
A marca “Google” continuará sendo a principal dessa nova holding, compreendendo todos os negócios relacionados à internet e sistemas operacionais. Ou seja, Google SearchYouTubeGmailGoogle+Mapas e Android ainda estarão sob o mesmo guarda-chuva.

Mas afinal, por que isso aconteceu?

O que essa nova mudança pode trazer de bom para a nova holding é a liberdade de atuar em vários segmentos de mercado diferentes sem ter que atrelar o nome “Google” a tudo, que já identifica implicitamente uma empresa de internet e tecnologia em geral. Ou seja, a Alphabet vai começar do zero e poderá ter negócios muito diversificados sem comprometer a identidade de suas subsidiárias.
Publicidade
Basicamente significa que a Google pode construir um portfólio muito mais amplo de novos negócios sem necessariamente envolver a 'marca Google'

Troca de CEOs

Fora essa mudança organizacional, a postagem oficial no blog da companhia explica que cada um desses negócios terá um CEO diferente, e a Alphabet será controlada pela dupla de fundadores Larry Page e Sergey Brin, sendo o primeiro o CEO da holding e o segundo o presidente.
Eles devem escolher quem vai comandar cada negócio, e a “divisão Google” já tem o seu novo chefe. Ele é Sundar Pichai que, antes de assumir o cargo de chefe executivo, estava à frente do departamento de engenharia e produtos, incluindo o Android. Page teceu vários elogios a Pichai em sua carta de anúncio da criação da Alphabet, e disse que ele será completamente capaz de levar a nova empresa adiante.

Financeiro

Ainda há poucas informações sobre quando essas mudanças vão de fato se concretizar, mas Page comentou que, quando o relatório do último trimestre fiscal deste ano for publicado, os valores e resultados já estarão separados. Além disso, as ações da atual “Google” serão todas convertidas em ações da “Alphabet” na NASDAQ.

Que diabos de site é esse?

O site da nova companhia já está no ar, “https://abc.xyz/”, e é um tanto estranho. Ao que parece, o nome Alphabet.com não estava mais disponível e/ou era muito caro. De qualquer forma, infelizmente ainda não há muita coisa na página para sanar a curiosidade de ninguém. Fique ligado no TecMundo para saber mais sobre isso.

Disruption In The Newspaper Industry — A Framework


Even though there have been volumes of work published on every single aspect of the current upheavals changing the face of the newspaper industry, consistent yet simple representations of the big picture seem really hard to come by. Which is why we have tried to create a framework showing a bird’s eye view of these causes and their interrelations.
Most of these trends shape the structural underpinnings of all media types, however our reflections are centered around the newspaper industry in a narrow sense.

Aim — Identify the key drivers of disruption and show how they are connected

Our flowchart is designed to help capture the most important macro trends at a glance, placing them in relation to each other. The first goal of this framework is to create an understanding of the challenges that we face as an industry. The second goal is to allow the mental positioning of projects and activities in relation to the drivers of the current structural change. This can help in assessing various options, identify innovation gaps and synchronize strategic measures. The latter being a step from the «problem level» which is visualized here to developing responses and solutions in order to tackle these challenges.
Diagrams like this are an oversimplification of reality. Yet we think that for practical purposes sometimes exactly this is necessary to facilitate high level strategic discussions.

Explanation — How to read this

By collecting and clustering the topics that are regularly discussed in news industry, we have identified four basic forces that drive the aforementioned structural change:
  1. Increasing content supply in the attention economy
  2. Increasing «power» of the individual
  3. Increasing role of technology in the core business
  4. Traditional business is no longer financially viable
While numbers 1. and 2. can be broadly subsumed under the category of market participants (indicated by the dashed line grouping them together), the forces under 3. all relate to infrastructural changes. Those under 4. fall into the category of monetization issues. Some of the subtrends originate in one category but exert their influence in other categories. «Falling barriers to market entry by declining costs» for example is a subtrend in the infrastructure category yet has «new, digital native content providers» as a consequence. These cases are indicated by corresponding colors. However: If you take away only one thing from this, it would be the four big drivers.

Feedback — A living document

We plan to treat our framework as a «living document» that will be expanded and refined. If you have feedback of any kind — be it criticism or aspects that we didn’t think of, we would greatly appreciate an email to labs_at_nzz.ch. Also: If you want to further discuss these themes, by all means, get in touch.
This post first appeared on labs.nzz.ch. NZZ Labs is the R&D team of Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Idea and concept: Florian SteglichThom NagyGudrun Moeller. Design: Samuel Raymann. Input: Florian GossyMathias MenzlDavid BauerMarkus HametnerNick Lüthi (thanks again!).